2024 Draft Guide Home
Go To NBA FantasyPass
Go To NFL FantasyPass
Go To MLB FantasyPass
Go To WagerPass
Go To DFS Pass
Bruski 150SportsEthos 2026 Fantasy Basketball Draft Guide
Fantasy Basketball Draft Guide 2026: Load Management Watch
Last Updated on September 25, 2026 11:51 am by Mike Passador | Published: September 25, 2026
Fantasy basketball is, has been and always will be a numbers game. At the end of the day, one of the biggest keys to victory is simply having your guys available. It’s not the most pleasant topic but absences are unavoidable. Injuries are unpredictable but planned nights off are something that we might be able to forecast to some extent, and that’s why we’re here today.
Load management was a hot topic around the league until the tanking discourse took over last season (with the flopping discourse hot on its heels). Fantasy managers know the pitfalls of load management more than most, as random nights off for the sake of unknowable long-term benefits have derailed more matchups than we can count. The league’s Player Participation Policy has caused quite the stir and there were a few occasions last season where you could feel players and teams working to hit that 65-game threshold to stay eligible for postseason awards. It might be helping to mitigate unnecessary absences, but the policy could also be having the opposite effect of forcing players back from injury too early, leading to aggravations and either longer-term absences or diminished play. In the extreme (and largely theoretical) cases, players who see they won’t be hitting the marks for postseason honors can operate without that games limit in mind at all, leading to more aggressive load management later in the year. For fantasy managers, the challenge is sharper than ever: elite per-game production is invaluable, but those absences pile up quickly, especially in leagues without flexible IR spots. Drafting with load management in mind is less about avoiding risk altogether and more about knowing which players are most likely to miss chunks of the season and building rosters that can withstand their absences.
Beyond injury-related absences, recently managers have had to work around organizational edicts to lose games as managers figured out the meta game of being as bad as possible to accumulate high draft picks in order to restock a roster. Bad teams with no postseason aspirations would tank and tank hard, leaving their top players on the sidelines for weeks at a time in the name of the greater good. It’s a valid strategy but ultimately cut into the NBA’s reputation as an entertainment product and the league took swift action to reform the draft lottery and disincentivize purposeful losing.
To reset things, it’s fair to wonder how much tank-related load management we’ll have to deal with this season. Look around the NBA:
In the East, you have 12 teams — New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Detroit, Toronto, Boston, Miami, Indiana, Atlanta, Orlando, Charlotte and Washington (in no particular order) — that are angling to at least make the playoffs. Not one team in that bunch would look you in the eye and say they don’t expect to be competitive this season. That leaves just Chicago, Milwaukee and Brooklyn with no real chances of making the postseason.
In the West, you’ve got Oklahoma City, San Antonio, Minnesota, Denver, the Lakers and Houston as reasonable playoff locks; Utah should be new to the postseason chance; Phoenix, Portland and Golden State are all going to be trying while the Pelicans and Clippers aren’t exactly in position to rebuild. That leaves the Mavs, Kings and Grizzlies on the outside looking in, and the Mavs could end up playing their way out of this category if a few things break right.
We’re looking at six teams that nobody expects to be involved in the postseason festivities. Those teams will want to finish outside the very bottom of the standings anyway, however, as the basement no longer gives you the top odds of taking home the No. 1 pick. This could theoretically open up a situation where teams clearly mired in the 4-10 spots know they have some wiggle room and shut players down, but there won’t be many in that bunch that didn’t enter the season with playoff hopes. Midseason injuries and failed experiments can always change things but as it stands, we don’t see any teams primed to sit out their entire starting five starting in March — anyone invested in the Utah Jazz can rejoice.
As Keston so expertly explained in his article, some teams aren’t even in control of their own first-round picks. Those are the teams for whom finishing at the very bottom might not matter quite as much. The Nets, Bucks and Clippers are the teams that carry the most risk in terms of not caring how low they finish, though you can easily argue that the Clippers won’t want to finish there anyway given the roster they have assembled. It’s still September and things move fast in the NBA but we’re not expecting aggressive, back-breaking load management that fantasy GMs have to work around. Guys will still miss games but if we can limit the absences to injury and recovery rather than proactive or excessive time off, the season becomes a bit less of a minefield.
With that all out of the way, let’s go team by team to see which players might be in line for a little load management.
Atlanta Hawks
The Hawks’ top players don’t currently project for load management. That can always change with one in-season injury but for now it all looks good and this team will be trying to compete in a stacked field.
The one name to watch out for is Mo Gueye, who suffered a left foot fracture and underwent surgery in July. That comes with a 3-4 month reevaluation timeline, putting Gueye’s opening night in extreme jeopardy. When he does return, the nature of his injury suggests that Gueye will play limited minutes and almost surely sit out in back-to-back spots. Luckily for fantasy managers, Gueye was not going to factor into the decision-making either way.
Boston Celtics
The Celtics are a bit of a different story in that there are three players lined up for potential load management, including one who is all but guaranteed to miss regular action.
Let’s start with the biggest question mark, Jayson Tatum. Tatum returned from a torn Achilles last season, debuting in March to help Boston’s playoff push when the initial expectation was that he would take the entire year off to rehab. The Celtics’ schedule featured only two back-to-backs from that point on and Tatum sat out one leg of each; he also sat out one standalone game, the season finale and then Game 7 vs. the Sixers (for an unrelated issue). Common sense says that Tatum will sit out in back-to-backs, but he has now had a full offseason to recover and the Celtics didn’t exactly baby him last year with 32.6 mpg in his 16 appearances. There wasn’t extra caution displayed last year beyond the basics of not playing on consecutive nights, so we’re not expecting too much now that he’s several more months removed from his rehab.
Tatum’s new running mate, Paul George, could be a different story. He missed the first 12 games of last season due to recovery from offseason left knee surgery and continued to miss regular action thereafter. He only played in one back-to-back set all season — the third- and second-last games of the campaign. Even that comes with an asterisk, as George simply needed to shake off the rust following a 25-game suspension that did leave him looking a lot more spry. It turns out that six weeks off in the middle of the season will help you rest and recover. Who knew? So far George has managed to avoid more offseason ailments but everyone is aware of his injury history at this point and the Celtics don’t seem likely to push him through back-to-backs. It’s not impossible, however, and the real risk with George is whatever knocks he’ll pick up along the way rather than what you can forecast right now.
Mitchell Robinson doesn’t quite carry the reputation but he could be the new, actual king of load management. He missed the first four games of last season for injury management despite making it through the preseason without any injuries or procedures and mercifully that did not set the tone for the season. Robinson missed one game in November, a three-game block in December and the season finale but otherwise was only held out in back-to-back spots. That should be the expectation going forward so managers can pencil in Robinson for a baseline level of absences; the last time he played in consecutive games was April 4 and 5, 2024. On top of the outright missed games, Robinson has not shown he can handle more than the short end of timeshare minutes. While he can be productive in that time, this blend makes him a tough sell in standard leagues unless you’re drafting for his exact profile.
Want to find out who the league’s biggest load management risks are? You’ll need to have an Ethos 360, All-Sport or NBA FantasyPass membership. Click here to learn more and sign up! Premium Access Required
- About the Author
- Latest Posts
Mike graduated from Boston University’s Dual Degree Program with a BA in Economics and a BS in Business with Concentrations in Marketing and Operations Management. He is a faithful supporter of Toronto sports and the Detroit Lions and is always ready to be let down. Tweet to him @Mike_Pandador, but if you badmouth Jose Calderon you might get blocked.
