With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Slovenia: Luka’s Team — All-In Again

Group D – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Slovenia enters EuroBasket 2025 with familiar hopes — and familiar risks. The roster is aging, the supporting cast is flawed, but when you have Luka Dončić at the controls, anything is possible. After a disappointing 2023 World Cup and another rocky qualifying stretch, this might be the last big run with this core. And Luka seems ready to carry the weight once again.

Best Players: Luka Dončić remains the focal point — and possibly the best player in the entire tournament. Klemen Prepelic (26 PPG in qualifiers) is their top perimeter shot-creator outside of Luka, while Gregor Hrovat does a bit of everything as a two-way glue guy.

Path: Slovenia finished the qualifiers 4–2, dropping both of their road games (to Portugal and Israel). Not a disaster, but not the sign of a top-tier squad either. They often struggled without Luka, and the team’s dependency on him was hard to miss.

Strengths: Luka Dončić. That’s it. He can single-handedly dominate a game.
Low Turnovers. They protect the ball well and rarely give opponents easy points.
Pace Control. Luka slows the game to a tempo he can manipulate — useful against faster, deeper teams. Scrappiness. They get physical on defense and force teams into uncomfortable shots. Continuity. The core group has played together for years, and that chemistry still matters in international play.

Weaknesses: Slovenia’s biggest issue is floor spacing — only Prepelic shot reliably during qualifiers, and most of his looks came off the dribble. The aging core doesn’t help; many key pieces are past their peak, and the younger players bring defense but not much creation or shooting. The Luka dependency is real — when he sits, the offense stalls. Defensive lapses are another concern, especially beyond the guard positions where lateral quickness and rotations falter. No reinforcement is expected from Vlatko Čančar, who opted to focus on his EuroLeague prep — a significant loss on the wing. And with no athletic rim-runner in the frontcourt, their offense becomes more static and reliant on halfcourt brilliance.

Bottom Line: This team will go as far as Luka can drag them. Without a vertical threat like Nebo, Slovenia becomes easier to guard in the paint and lacks the physical interior presence needed to deter elite slashers. The defense holds up in stretches, but without a true eraser at the rim, they’ll need to outsmart — not outmuscle — better teams. If Luka goes nuclear, this team can absolutely threaten anyone in a single-elimination game.

Expectation: Dangerous because of Luka, flawed everywhere else

If the roster around him steps up just a little, we might be watching another deep run. If not? It’ll be Luka vs the world.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Belgium: Grit, Guts and No Go-To Guy?

Group D – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Belgium comes into EuroBasket 2025 as one of the most disciplined and hard-working teams in the tournament. They don’t have the raw talent of the top contenders, but they make up for it with structure and toughness. Originally, the presence of NBA-level names like Toumani Camara and Ajay Mitchell promised to boost their upside, but both have now been ruled out of the tournament. The recent news that star guard Retin Obasohan will also miss the competition due to an injury is a devastating blow. This absence of their primary offensive engine and two key NBA players completely changes the outlook for Belgium, narrowing their margin for error and putting immense pressure on their established core.

Best Players: With Obasohan out, this is no longer a team with a clear-cut leader. He was one of the most productive guards in any group during qualifiers, averaging 20 points and over five assists per game. His ability to break down defenses and create for others was the foundation of Belgium’s offense. Now, with Mitchell and Camara also out, the team’s offensive and defensive depth takes a massive hit. Emmanuel Lecomte, who was the second-best scorer in qualifiers, is now expected to step up. While he is a capable scorer, he isn’t the same type of playmaker as Obasohan and creating for others isn’t his strong suit.

Path: Belgium finished with a 3–3 record. They were swept by a red-hot Latvia squad but did snag a gritty win against Spain at home. That victory came with Obasohan on the floor — they lost the return game without him, but qualification was already in the bag. Slovakia was no match, as Belgium swept that series behind physicality and defensive pressure.

Strengths: This team thrives in structure. Their defense is tough and connected, particularly on the ball — they held Spain under 60 points, a rare feat in modern international basketball. They don’t beat themselves and they’ll punish sloppy opponents. The double-teaming and pressure that opponents used to put on Obasohan on every pick-and-roll will likely be softened now, which could open up opportunities for other players.

Weaknesses: The ceiling is now more limited than ever without Camara, Mitchell, and maybe most critically, Obasohan. The biggest concern is the lack of a reliable shot creator. While Lecomte can score, he isn’t as efficient when he’s forced to be the primary playmaker. Belgium still lacks interior presence, which Spain exposed badly. Their shooting is streaky (just 31% from deep during qualifiers), and in games where the offense can’t get into a rhythm, they’ll struggle to generate consistent looks.

Bottom Line: Belgium won’t wow you with highlight plays or high-octane runs. They’re stubborn, physical, and well-drilled, but losing their top three players for EuroBasket makes their task incredibly tough. The team will have to rely on their defense and an offense-by-committee approach. They can still be a difficult opponent, but their chances of stealing a game or two in the group stage are now much slimmer.

Expectation: A well-coached spoiler, if they’re lucky

Don’t expect a deep run. The defense is real, but without their main offensive weapon, it’s hard to see where the scoring will come from. They will be a tough out, but their margin for error is razor-thin.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Israel: Guard-Led and Sharpshooting in Group D

Group D – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Israel enters EuroBasket 2025 as a dynamic guard-driven team, backed by a strong qualifying performance and the return of NBA star Deni Avdija. Their success hinges on perimeter shooting and smart ball movement, with the hope that their frontcourt can support enough defensively and on the glass. This squad is built to push tempo and score efficiently from distance but will need to minimize turnovers to advance deep.

Best Players: Yam Madar led the qualifiers with 20 points per game, providing reliable scoring and playmaking. Tomer Ginat also impressed with 17 PPG. However, Deni Avdija is the true centerpiece after a stellar NBA season, averaging 17 points, 7 rebounds, 4 assists, and shooting 37% from three. His versatility will be crucial for Israel’s offensive flow.

Path: Israel topped their group in qualifying with a 5–1 record. Their lone loss came on the road against Slovenia, but they earned a hard-fought 2-point win over Portugal away. This strong record shows their ability to compete under pressure and close tight games.

Strengths: A guard-focused team that thrives on ball movement and shooting. Their frontcourt players complement the guards, providing solid screens and quick reactions to maintain offensive rhythm. Israel shot an impressive 37.7% from beyond the arc on 22 attempts per game, making them a serious threat from distance.

Weaknesses: Limited creation and athleticism in the frontcourt could be exploited by more physical opponents. The team averaged 14 turnovers per game, struggling against aggressive full-court pressure. Addressing these defensive and ball security issues will be key to progressing.

Bottom Line: If Israel’s key players, led by Avdija and Madar, maintain their shooting and decision-making, this team can advance past the group stage. Frontcourt limitations and turnover issues will challenge them, but their offensive firepower makes them dangerous in any matchup.

Power Ranking: Sharpshooters with upside

A talented backcourt and strong shooting define their ceiling, but consistency and defensive toughness will shape their tournament journey.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Iceland: The Ice Is Thin, But the Fight Is Real

Group D – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Don’t let the lack of flash fool you — Iceland comes into EuroBasket 2025 as a team with real structure, top-heavy talent and a clear plan. They won’t scare anyone on paper, but they’ve proven they can hang with elite teams when clicking. A few key players drive the engine, and if they stay healthy, Iceland has enough cohesion to bother more talented opponents.

Best Players: Martin Hermannsson was electric during the qualifiers, pouring in 20 points per game while taking over as the team’s primary scorer. Alongside him, Elvar Fridriksson dished 7 assists per game and provided essential ball security and playmaking. The backcourt duo is among the most productive in the tournament. Add Tryggvi Hlinason, the 7-footer who nearly averaged 3 blocks per game, and you’ve got a team built on a clear inside-out formula.

Path: A 3–3 record in a competitive qualifying group speaks volumes. They beat Turkey in Reykjavík and only lost the return game by a point. They also stunned Italy in Rome before losing the reverse fixture at home. The one real slip-up came in Hungary, where they let a winnable game get away. Still, this team showed it can punch above its weight.

Strengths: Ball security is a major asset — Iceland keeps turnovers low and rarely beats itself. Offensively, they move quickly out of actions, with Martin and Elvar reading and reacting to the defense at a high level. Tryggvi anchors the defense and brings real shot-blocking and physicality inside. This trio plays with chemistry and purpose.

Weaknesses: Beyond those three, things get dicey. There’s limited shot creation outside the guards, and the team often stalls when facing switching defenses. They hit just 33% from three, not bad but not enough to stretch teams out. Defensively, weak-side awareness is shaky, especially when rotating to the perimeter. Drop coverage against pick-and-pop bigs has hurt them — they allow too many clean looks from deep.

Bottom Line: Iceland has enough high-level performers to be dangerous, but not enough depth to sustain that level across a full tournament. If their three stars stay healthy and hot, they’ll be a problem — but they’re just one cold shooting night away from trouble.

Expectation: Smart, tough, but stretched thin

Expect them to steal a game or two, but depth and spacing will keep their ceiling low.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

France: Loaded with Depth, But Missing the Towers

Group D – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Even without their twin interior anchors — Rudy Gobert and Victor Wembanyama — France arrives at EuroBasket 2025 as one of the deepest and most athletic teams in the tournament. New coach, new cycle, and still the same high expectations. Their roster oozes NBA talent, and they remain a contender even without a traditional big to dominate the paint.

Best Players: France used a wide rotation in the qualifiers, and no single player stood out for long stretches — only Andrew Albicy played five games, serving as the veteran stabilizer. But now the stars return. Zaccharie Risacher and Alexandre Sarr bring fresh NBA pedigree, while Bilal Coulibaly and Guerschon Yabusele provide elite physical tools and FIBA experience. No Rudy, no Wemby, no problem? We’ll see.

Path: A clean 6–0 record in the qualifiers. They didn’t always dominate, but they found ways to win every time — even grinding out tough games against Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia late in the cycle. Elie Okobo hit a buzzer-beater to down Bosnia and Herzegovina, proving this team can handle adversity even when the stars sit.

Strengths: France’s strengths start with athleticism — even without their elite rim protectors, this team is built to run, fly, and switch across all positions. Their depth might be the best in the tournament; they can rotate full five-man units without much of a dip in quality or intensity. On the perimeter, physical defenders like Bilal Coulibaly and Isaïa Cordinier make life miserable for opposing ball-handlers, giving France the tools to disrupt even the most structured offenses.

Weaknesses: France’s weaknesses center on their frontcourt, which lacks a tested center due to the absences of Gobert and Wembanyama, leaving them short on size and elite rim protection, while Lessort’s absence further deprives them of a solid contributor in the big spots. Their off-ball defense still needs improvement, especially in help-side timing and rotations, an issue that becomes more pronounced with smaller lineups. Additionally, their three-point shooting during qualifiers was inconsistent, with low volume and efficiency; although the NBA additions should bolster this area, it remains uncertain how they’ll perform under pressure.

Bottom Line: France might not have its most dominant version of the roster, but even this “Plan B” group is good enough to compete for a medal. If Sarr and Risacher find their rhythm quickly, and the wings stay aggressive on both ends, they’ll be a nightmare matchup for anyone.

Expectation: Still elite, even without their towers in the middle

They won’t be the tallest, but they just might be the fastest and on of the deepest.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Poland: Home Court, But a Long Way Home

Group D – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Poland enters EuroBasket 2025 as one of the four host nations, but hosting duties may be their biggest advantage. After a tough qualifying campaign where they went just 1–5, the Poles come into the tournament under pressure and with something to prove. The loss of star forward Jeremy Sochan with a calf injury was a huge blow, but the recent confirmation that veteran EuroLeague guard Jordan Loyd will join the team as their naturalized player has completely changed the team’s outlook. His presence provides a much-needed scoring punch and leadership, giving the Poles a new hope.

Best Players: While Mateusz Ponitka is still the heart and soul of this team, the addition of Jordan Loyd gives them a dynamic scoring partner. Loyd is a proven EuroLeague scorer and playmaker, and he’ll be expected to shoulder a significant offensive load. He brings a level of consistency and clutch play that was sorely missing in Sochan’s absence. Michal Michalak remains a consistent scoring threat, and Aleksander Balcerowski provides a solid interior presence and pick-and-roll partner for both Ponitka and now Loyd.

Path: Poland had a rocky road in qualifying, though it was more about testing than results — they were already qualified as hosts. Still, the performances raised concerns. They lost five of six, including both games to North Macedonia by double digits. Their lone win came in a nail-biter against Estonia. That’s not exactly the résumé of a contender, but Loyd’s addition could make those results less relevant.

Strengths: The addition of Jordan Loyd is a game-changer. He immediately addresses the team’s need for a go-to scorer and shot creator. His ability to shoot from deep, drive to the basket, and make plays for others will make their half-court offense much more fluid and less predictable. This will also take some pressure off of Ponitka, who can now be more of a bully in mismatches. Poland will have the home crowd to cheer them on, and with Loyd’s EuroLeague experience, they now have a proven player who is used to performing on the big stage.

Weaknesses: The team still has issues. Despite Loyd’s addition, the team’s shooting from deep (a brutal 25.9% in qualifiers) is a major concern. They’re still turnover-prone and can be undisciplined on transition defense. While Loyd helps, the loss of Sochan’s defensive versatility and athleticism leaves a gap on that end of the floor that other players will have to fill.

Bottom Line: The home crowd and the addition of Jordan Loyd give Poland a real chance to be a spoiler in this tournament. He can provide the spark and offensive consistency they’ll need to compete. While the team still has its flaws, the star power of Loyd and Ponitka, combined with the energy of the home crowd, could be a recipe for a few upsets.

Expectation: Home-court advantage and a fighting chance

Hosting helps and Loyd’s presence makes them a much more dangerous team. Don’t be surprised if they steal a game or two in the group stage and make a push for the knockout rounds.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Italy: Dangerous When It Clicks

Group C – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Italy enters EuroBasket 2025 with momentum and intrigue. Their qualifying path wasn’t spotless — they dropped surprising games to Hungary and Iceland — but both came under depleted conditions. At full strength, this is a fast, skilled, and well-coached group that’s trending up. With key reinforcements set to join, Italy is shaping up to be one of the tournament’s most enticing dark horses.

Best Players: Nicolò Melli was a stabilizer during qualifiers (16 EFF, 9 rebounds per game), while Spagnolo showed real go-to scoring chops at just 21. Pajola ran the offense with poise, averaging 7 assists and doing the dirty work defensively. That core alone is solid — but it’s the additions that shift the ceiling.

Roster Shake-Up and New Dynamics: Originally, Italy had penciled in NBA swingman Donte DiVincenzo as a marquee addition — a versatile two-way piece who could’ve unlocked another level with his defense, spacing, and shot-making. Unfortunately, DiVincenzo has announced he’s still recovering from injury and won’t be available. It’s a significant blow: Italy loses an elite perimeter defender, a high-level floor spacer (career 3PT threat), and a proven competitor who elevates teammates.

In his place, Italy will turn to naturalized guard Darius Thompson. While not a like-for-like replacement, Thompson offers intriguing value as a pass-first ball handler with excellent feel and pace. His presence adds a new layer to Italy’s creation game — especially useful when Pajola is off the floor or facing pressure. Where Pajola sometimes struggles with rim pressure, Thompson excels, giving Italy a secondary driver who can collapse defenses and keep the ball moving.

Path: 4–2. Italy handled Turkey with ease in both meetings and bounced back to dominate Hungary and Iceland in the return legs. Losses came in shorthanded games — no Melli vs Hungary, no Pajola or Spagnolo vs Iceland — which makes the overall record look shakier than it was.

Strengths: This team cuts hard, moves the ball well (especially in two-big actions with Ricci and Melli), and shoots it at 38% from deep — albeit on modest volume. They have positional athleticism, off-ball fluidity, and an unselfish style that’s hard to guard when shots are falling. Thompson’s ball-handling fits nicely into this free-flowing offense.

Weaknesses: The big-man rotation lacks real interior bite. They have no true rim protector, and when shots aren’t dropping, they can become too reliant on guards and secondary creation. Losing DiVincenzo also hurts their defensive ceiling and spacing — both areas he could’ve boosted significantly. Transition defense and discipline in rotations remain question marks.

Bottom Line: Italy is still built to surprise. The loss of DiVincenzo stings — there’s no sugarcoating that — but Thompson’s addition is not without value. With Fontecchio healthy and Gallinari potentially spacing the floor, this is still a clever, well-drilled group that can hang with almost anyone. They’ll need to shoot it well and stay connected defensively, but if they do, they’ll be a problem.

Expectation: The Smart, Slippery Contender

Dark horse status isn’t a cliché here. Even without DiVincenzo, this team is legit — just in a slightly different way.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Spain: Scariolo’s Last Dance, Minus Their Engine

Group C – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Spain enters EuroBasket 2025 at a crossroads. Sergio Scariolo — the architect of their modern era of dominance — is set to coach his final tournament, but the roster he’ll lead into battle is short on firepower and, now, short on stability. A major blow came just weeks before the tournament: veteran point guard Lorenzo Brown is out, replaced by 18-year-old prospect Mario Saint-Supery. It’s a symbolic shift — from battle-tested floor general to unproven upside — and a reminder that this version of Spain is navigating a true generational handoff.

Best Players: Santi Aldama is now the unquestioned headliner. The Grizzlies big man brings inside scoring, soft touch and size, and with Willy Hernangómez’s form uncertain, Aldama becomes the fulcrum. Santi Yusta was the top performer during qualifiers, averaging 16 PPG and hitting a buzzer-beater to save them against Slovakia. Saint-Supery (If he makes the final cut) brings talent and flair, but no FIBA experience — which indicates an even greater burden onto other creators like  Darío Brizuela.

Path: 3–3. Spain experimented heavily in the qualifiers, using 28 different players. They were swept by Latvia and lost away to Belgium, but swept Slovakia — including the aforementioned Yusta miracle to force OT in one game. It was never about results; it was a long look at depth.

Strengths: Few teams can match Spain’s cohesion. Scariolo knows how to build systems around his available tools and his defensive schemes — zone, traps, hybrid coverages — keep opponents guessing. This team still moves the ball well, and their chemistry helps cover up athletic gaps.

Weaknesses: Without Brown, playmaking becomes a major concern. Aldama isn’t a primary initiator and while Juancho, Brizuela and Yusta offer spacing, they can be streaky. The inside game leans too much on finesse and the overall offensive ceiling is low. Turnovers are a recurring issue. Spain will fight, but their margin for error just shrank.

Bottom Line: Scariolo will squeeze every ounce out of this group, but the absence of Brown is a gut punch to Spain’s half-court offense. The defense will keep them competitive, but without a trusted late-game creator, they’ll have to win ugly — and win together.

Expectation: Pedigree with Limits

The tools are there to make noise, but Spain now looks more like a tough out than a medal threat.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Georgia: Big, Bruising and Built for the Halfcourt

Group C – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Georgia enters EuroBasket 2025 leaning into their identity — physicality, interior playmaking, and bruising mismatches in the halfcourt. Tornike Shengelia remains the heart of the team, but if Goga Bitadze and Sandro Mamukelashvili are available, Georgia’s frontline becomes one of the most imposing in the tournament. The question is whether they can balance that interior force with enough shooting and transition defense to hang with more dynamic rosters.

Best Players: Shengelia did the heavy lifting in the qualifiers, averaging 23 points and 7 boards while commanding attention on nearly every halfcourt possession. If Bitadze suits up, Georgia gets an elite rim protector and strong defensive anchor. Mamukelashvili adds a stretch-big wrinkle and a connector in lineups that need more fluidity.

Path: 3–3. Dropped both games to Serbia and stumbled early vs Denmark, but bounced back with two crucial wins over Finland and a narrow revenge win vs Denmark at home. Qualified by grinding games out — true to form.

Strengths: Few teams can match Georgia’s big-man rotation in raw size and versatility. Shengelia’s inside playmaking is a legitimate offensive hub and the team plays well off cuts and short rolls. If Goga plays, they gain a high-level rim deterrent and paint presence. Overall, there’s toughness, rebounding, and a willingness to play through contact.

Weaknesses: They’re built for the halfcourt, but that comes at a cost. Transition defense is spotty at best, and they allowed far too many easy run-outs during qualifiers. With only 33% shooting from three and limited movement threats, spacing can vanish quickly. That allows teams to load the paint and live with the results.

Bottom Line: Georgia knows exactly what it is — and they’re banking on size, discipline, and interior play to get them through Group C. But the margins are thin. Without better floor spacing or improved defensive urgency, they’ll need near-perfect games from their stars to make noise past the group stage.

Expectation: Heavy but Unpolished

Physicality alone gets them through games. But for a deeper run, they’ll need a little more finesse.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Bosnia and Herzegovina: Firepower, Frontcourt and Flaws

Group C – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Bosnia and Herzegovina arrives at EuroBasket 2025 with their usual promise: a dynamic offense, physicality inside and just enough unpredictability to ruin someone’s knockout bracket. They’re not among the tournament’s elites, but with a motivated roster and two high-level NBA bigs potentially joining, they could be more than just dangerous.

Best Players: Dzanan Musa is the engine. The Euroleague star is the team primary creator, scorer and heartbeat, but he’s not alone. Aleksandar Lazić and Kenan Kamenjaš were efficient, double-digit scorers during the qualifiers, playing off Musa’s gravity and showing real toughness. If Luka Garza and Jusuf Nurkić suit up — and the latter seems increasingly likely — the team instantly becomes one of the most physical in the paint.

Path: They went 3–3 in a tricky group. They lost both games to France, one at the buzzer, but crushed Cyprus and split with Croatia. Most telling was their win over Croatia in the final game — a physical battle they took over late, suggesting they’re a team that knows how to impose their will when it matters.

Strengths: They play an unselfish, high-IQ brand of offense. While Musa is clearly the go-to guy, the ball moves well and they’re not overly reliant on isolation. On the glass, they’re relentless — and if Nurkić and Garza both join, they’ll be among the tournament’s best rebounding teams. Their frontcourt size and physicality will give teams problems, especially in slower, half-court games.

Weaknesses: Their weaknesses are familiar: they shot just 34% from three during qualifiers, which on its own isn’t a massive issue, but it came on extremely low volume. Without reliable perimeter threats, opposing defenses can sag into the paint, making life difficult for their creators. Defensively, their bigs are slow-footed and vulnerable in space—switches, hedges, and blitzes often lead to breakdowns. Inconsistencies in defensive discipline and communication also remain a concern.

Bottom Line: This roster has a real chance to punch above their seeding — especially if Nurkić joins the roster. Musa is a proven star and their core has chemistry. But without more consistent shooting and better defensive structure, they may find themselves stuck in the middle tier. Still, no team in Group C will enjoy facing them.

Expectation: Big, Bold and Bruising (but still flawed)

Not quite a dark horse — yet. With Nurkić and Garza in, they might be knocking on the door.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Greece: Built Around Giannis, But Is It Enough?

Group C – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Greece heads into EuroBasket 2025 with a proven formula: elite defense, discipline and Giannis Antetokounmpo doing superhuman things. It has worked before and it will keep them in any game. But as always, the question is whether the supporting cast can carry its weight — especially when Giannis is not on the floor. They were quietly shaky in qualifying and unless a few wings step up, they might walk the familiar tightrope between contender and crash-out.

Best Players: Giannis is the obvious focal point and after a strong Olympic campaign in the “group of death” last summer, he enters EuroBasket ready to dominate. His rim pressure, transition game and defensive range change the equation entirely. Papanikolaou brings toughness and defensive stability on the wing. Toliopoulos was the most consistent presence in the qualifiers, playing all six games, though he often took a backseat when higher-caliber talent was available.

Path: Greece finished 5–1 in a surprisingly competitive group. Wins rarely came easy: their largest margin was just 9 points, and even the games against lighter opponents were tight — they beat the Netherlands by 4 and 2, and lost to Great Britain by one. It was enough to qualify comfortably, but not without flashing a few warning signs.

Strengths: Defense is the identity here. Greece finished top-4 defensively in the qualifying stage, and Giannis only elevates that ceiling. The coaching staff does an excellent job masking weaknesses and playing to the strengths of each lineup. Off-ball movement and role clarity are key pillars — though those may shift a bit with Giannis absorbing more on-ball usage.

Weaknesses: The half-court offense remains a concern. Without Giannis, creation dries up quickly, and shooting limitations across the roster can shrink the floor even when he’s in. Spacing remains an issue, and teams that load up the paint can neutralize much of their drive-and-kick action. They’ll need someone to find rhythm as a secondary engine.

Bottom Line: Giannis gives Greece a real chance, and their defense will keep them alive in any matchup. But without better shooting and more reliable creation, the same old story could play out. If role players step up, they’re dangerous. If not, they’ll lean heavily on one of the best player in the tournament to carry the load — again.

Expectation: Dangerous, But Still Dependent

This is a top-heavy team. Giannis can win you a knockout game, but they need more than that to win the whole thing.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Cyprus: Host Role, Harsh Reality

Group C – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Hosting EuroBasket 2025 should be a moment of celebration for Cyprus, but on the court, it’s shaping up to be a steep uphill climb. The home crowd will bring energy, but the talent gap is stark — Cyprus went 0–6 in the qualifiers and none of the losses were particularly close.

Best Players: Konstantinos Simitzis showed flashes during qualifiers, while Darral Willis was one of their better performers but won’t suit up for the tournament. Filippos Tigkas is the name to watch — a crafty young guard who could emerge as a breakout player despite the team’s struggles.

Path: 0–6. Cyprus never managed to find footing or momentum and couldn’t compete for wins across the board. As tournament hosts, they qualify automatically — but on paper, they remain a tier below the rest of Group C.

Strengths: Tigkas brings legitimate talent and flair to the backcourt. He’ll be given the keys and a green light, which could lead to some highlight moments even in tough losses.

Weaknesses: The talent gap is real. Cyprus struggles to shoot from deep, turns the ball over too often, and lacks the depth or size to compete for four quarters. They’ll battle — but realistically, they’ll be outgunned in every matchup.

Bottom Line: Cyprus is here thanks to the host berth, and they’ll embrace the stage — but every game will be a survival test. Still, the experience could be invaluable for their younger core.

Expectation: #24 – The Host Underdog

Competitive spirit isn’t the issue. Talent is.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.