With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Poland: Home Court, But a Long Way Home

Group D – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Poland enters EuroBasket 2025 as one of the four host nations, but hosting duties may be their biggest advantage. After a tough qualifying campaign where they went just 1–5, the Poles come into the tournament under pressure and with something to prove. The loss of star forward Jeremy Sochan with a calf injury was a huge blow, but the recent confirmation that veteran EuroLeague guard Jordan Loyd will join the team as their naturalized player has completely changed the team’s outlook. His presence provides a much-needed scoring punch and leadership, giving the Poles a new hope.

Best Players: While Mateusz Ponitka is still the heart and soul of this team, the addition of Jordan Loyd gives them a dynamic scoring partner. Loyd is a proven EuroLeague scorer and playmaker, and he’ll be expected to shoulder a significant offensive load. He brings a level of consistency and clutch play that was sorely missing in Sochan’s absence. Michal Michalak remains a consistent scoring threat, and Aleksander Balcerowski provides a solid interior presence and pick-and-roll partner for both Ponitka and now Loyd.

Path: Poland had a rocky road in qualifying, though it was more about testing than results — they were already qualified as hosts. Still, the performances raised concerns. They lost five of six, including both games to North Macedonia by double digits. Their lone win came in a nail-biter against Estonia. That’s not exactly the résumé of a contender, but Loyd’s addition could make those results less relevant.

Strengths: The addition of Jordan Loyd is a game-changer. He immediately addresses the team’s need for a go-to scorer and shot creator. His ability to shoot from deep, drive to the basket, and make plays for others will make their half-court offense much more fluid and less predictable. This will also take some pressure off of Ponitka, who can now be more of a bully in mismatches. Poland will have the home crowd to cheer them on, and with Loyd’s EuroLeague experience, they now have a proven player who is used to performing on the big stage.

Weaknesses: The team still has issues. Despite Loyd’s addition, the team’s shooting from deep (a brutal 25.9% in qualifiers) is a major concern. They’re still turnover-prone and can be undisciplined on transition defense. While Loyd helps, the loss of Sochan’s defensive versatility and athleticism leaves a gap on that end of the floor that other players will have to fill.

Bottom Line: The home crowd and the addition of Jordan Loyd give Poland a real chance to be a spoiler in this tournament. He can provide the spark and offensive consistency they’ll need to compete. While the team still has its flaws, the star power of Loyd and Ponitka, combined with the energy of the home crowd, could be a recipe for a few upsets.

Expectation: Home-court advantage and a fighting chance

Hosting helps and Loyd’s presence makes them a much more dangerous team. Don’t be surprised if they steal a game or two in the group stage and make a push for the knockout rounds.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Italy: Dangerous When It Clicks

Group C – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Italy enters EuroBasket 2025 with momentum and intrigue. Their qualifying path wasn’t spotless — they dropped surprising games to Hungary and Iceland — but both came under depleted conditions. At full strength, this is a fast, skilled, and well-coached group that’s trending up. With key reinforcements set to join, Italy is shaping up to be one of the tournament’s most enticing dark horses.

Best Players: Nicolò Melli was a stabilizer during qualifiers (16 EFF, 9 rebounds per game), while Spagnolo showed real go-to scoring chops at just 21. Pajola ran the offense with poise, averaging 7 assists and doing the dirty work defensively. That core alone is solid — but it’s the additions that shift the ceiling.

Roster Shake-Up and New Dynamics: Originally, Italy had penciled in NBA swingman Donte DiVincenzo as a marquee addition — a versatile two-way piece who could’ve unlocked another level with his defense, spacing, and shot-making. Unfortunately, DiVincenzo has announced he’s still recovering from injury and won’t be available. It’s a significant blow: Italy loses an elite perimeter defender, a high-level floor spacer (career 3PT threat), and a proven competitor who elevates teammates.

In his place, Italy will turn to naturalized guard Darius Thompson. While not a like-for-like replacement, Thompson offers intriguing value as a pass-first ball handler with excellent feel and pace. His presence adds a new layer to Italy’s creation game — especially useful when Pajola is off the floor or facing pressure. Where Pajola sometimes struggles with rim pressure, Thompson excels, giving Italy a secondary driver who can collapse defenses and keep the ball moving.

Path: 4–2. Italy handled Turkey with ease in both meetings and bounced back to dominate Hungary and Iceland in the return legs. Losses came in shorthanded games — no Melli vs Hungary, no Pajola or Spagnolo vs Iceland — which makes the overall record look shakier than it was.

Strengths: This team cuts hard, moves the ball well (especially in two-big actions with Ricci and Melli), and shoots it at 38% from deep — albeit on modest volume. They have positional athleticism, off-ball fluidity, and an unselfish style that’s hard to guard when shots are falling. Thompson’s ball-handling fits nicely into this free-flowing offense.

Weaknesses: The big-man rotation lacks real interior bite. They have no true rim protector, and when shots aren’t dropping, they can become too reliant on guards and secondary creation. Losing DiVincenzo also hurts their defensive ceiling and spacing — both areas he could’ve boosted significantly. Transition defense and discipline in rotations remain question marks.

Bottom Line: Italy is still built to surprise. The loss of DiVincenzo stings — there’s no sugarcoating that — but Thompson’s addition is not without value. With Fontecchio healthy and Gallinari potentially spacing the floor, this is still a clever, well-drilled group that can hang with almost anyone. They’ll need to shoot it well and stay connected defensively, but if they do, they’ll be a problem.

Expectation: The Smart, Slippery Contender

Dark horse status isn’t a cliché here. Even without DiVincenzo, this team is legit — just in a slightly different way.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Spain: Scariolo’s Last Dance, Minus Their Engine

Group C – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Spain enters EuroBasket 2025 at a crossroads. Sergio Scariolo — the architect of their modern era of dominance — is set to coach his final tournament, but the roster he’ll lead into battle is short on firepower and, now, short on stability. A major blow came just weeks before the tournament: veteran point guard Lorenzo Brown is out, replaced by 18-year-old prospect Mario Saint-Supery. It’s a symbolic shift — from battle-tested floor general to unproven upside — and a reminder that this version of Spain is navigating a true generational handoff.

Best Players: Santi Aldama is now the unquestioned headliner. The Grizzlies big man brings inside scoring, soft touch and size, and with Willy Hernangómez’s form uncertain, Aldama becomes the fulcrum. Santi Yusta was the top performer during qualifiers, averaging 16 PPG and hitting a buzzer-beater to save them against Slovakia. Saint-Supery (If he makes the final cut) brings talent and flair, but no FIBA experience — which indicates an even greater burden onto other creators like  Darío Brizuela.

Path: 3–3. Spain experimented heavily in the qualifiers, using 28 different players. They were swept by Latvia and lost away to Belgium, but swept Slovakia — including the aforementioned Yusta miracle to force OT in one game. It was never about results; it was a long look at depth.

Strengths: Few teams can match Spain’s cohesion. Scariolo knows how to build systems around his available tools and his defensive schemes — zone, traps, hybrid coverages — keep opponents guessing. This team still moves the ball well, and their chemistry helps cover up athletic gaps.

Weaknesses: Without Brown, playmaking becomes a major concern. Aldama isn’t a primary initiator and while Juancho, Brizuela and Yusta offer spacing, they can be streaky. The inside game leans too much on finesse and the overall offensive ceiling is low. Turnovers are a recurring issue. Spain will fight, but their margin for error just shrank.

Bottom Line: Scariolo will squeeze every ounce out of this group, but the absence of Brown is a gut punch to Spain’s half-court offense. The defense will keep them competitive, but without a trusted late-game creator, they’ll have to win ugly — and win together.

Expectation: Pedigree with Limits

The tools are there to make noise, but Spain now looks more like a tough out than a medal threat.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Georgia: Big, Bruising and Built for the Halfcourt

Group C – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Georgia enters EuroBasket 2025 leaning into their identity — physicality, interior playmaking, and bruising mismatches in the halfcourt. Tornike Shengelia remains the heart of the team, but if Goga Bitadze and Sandro Mamukelashvili are available, Georgia’s frontline becomes one of the most imposing in the tournament. The question is whether they can balance that interior force with enough shooting and transition defense to hang with more dynamic rosters.

Best Players: Shengelia did the heavy lifting in the qualifiers, averaging 23 points and 7 boards while commanding attention on nearly every halfcourt possession. If Bitadze suits up, Georgia gets an elite rim protector and strong defensive anchor. Mamukelashvili adds a stretch-big wrinkle and a connector in lineups that need more fluidity.

Path: 3–3. Dropped both games to Serbia and stumbled early vs Denmark, but bounced back with two crucial wins over Finland and a narrow revenge win vs Denmark at home. Qualified by grinding games out — true to form.

Strengths: Few teams can match Georgia’s big-man rotation in raw size and versatility. Shengelia’s inside playmaking is a legitimate offensive hub and the team plays well off cuts and short rolls. If Goga plays, they gain a high-level rim deterrent and paint presence. Overall, there’s toughness, rebounding, and a willingness to play through contact.

Weaknesses: They’re built for the halfcourt, but that comes at a cost. Transition defense is spotty at best, and they allowed far too many easy run-outs during qualifiers. With only 33% shooting from three and limited movement threats, spacing can vanish quickly. That allows teams to load the paint and live with the results.

Bottom Line: Georgia knows exactly what it is — and they’re banking on size, discipline, and interior play to get them through Group C. But the margins are thin. Without better floor spacing or improved defensive urgency, they’ll need near-perfect games from their stars to make noise past the group stage.

Expectation: Heavy but Unpolished

Physicality alone gets them through games. But for a deeper run, they’ll need a little more finesse.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Bosnia and Herzegovina: Firepower, Frontcourt and Flaws

Group C – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Bosnia and Herzegovina arrives at EuroBasket 2025 with their usual promise: a dynamic offense, physicality inside and just enough unpredictability to ruin someone’s knockout bracket. They’re not among the tournament’s elites, but with a motivated roster and two high-level NBA bigs potentially joining, they could be more than just dangerous.

Best Players: Dzanan Musa is the engine. The Euroleague star is the team primary creator, scorer and heartbeat, but he’s not alone. Aleksandar Lazić and Kenan Kamenjaš were efficient, double-digit scorers during the qualifiers, playing off Musa’s gravity and showing real toughness. If Luka Garza and Jusuf Nurkić suit up — and the latter seems increasingly likely — the team instantly becomes one of the most physical in the paint.

Path: They went 3–3 in a tricky group. They lost both games to France, one at the buzzer, but crushed Cyprus and split with Croatia. Most telling was their win over Croatia in the final game — a physical battle they took over late, suggesting they’re a team that knows how to impose their will when it matters.

Strengths: They play an unselfish, high-IQ brand of offense. While Musa is clearly the go-to guy, the ball moves well and they’re not overly reliant on isolation. On the glass, they’re relentless — and if Nurkić and Garza both join, they’ll be among the tournament’s best rebounding teams. Their frontcourt size and physicality will give teams problems, especially in slower, half-court games.

Weaknesses: Their weaknesses are familiar: they shot just 34% from three during qualifiers, which on its own isn’t a massive issue, but it came on extremely low volume. Without reliable perimeter threats, opposing defenses can sag into the paint, making life difficult for their creators. Defensively, their bigs are slow-footed and vulnerable in space—switches, hedges, and blitzes often lead to breakdowns. Inconsistencies in defensive discipline and communication also remain a concern.

Bottom Line: This roster has a real chance to punch above their seeding — especially if Nurkić joins the roster. Musa is a proven star and their core has chemistry. But without more consistent shooting and better defensive structure, they may find themselves stuck in the middle tier. Still, no team in Group C will enjoy facing them.

Expectation: Big, Bold and Bruising (but still flawed)

Not quite a dark horse — yet. With Nurkić and Garza in, they might be knocking on the door.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Greece: Built Around Giannis, But Is It Enough?

Group C – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Greece heads into EuroBasket 2025 with a proven formula: elite defense, discipline and Giannis Antetokounmpo doing superhuman things. It has worked before and it will keep them in any game. But as always, the question is whether the supporting cast can carry its weight — especially when Giannis is not on the floor. They were quietly shaky in qualifying and unless a few wings step up, they might walk the familiar tightrope between contender and crash-out.

Best Players: Giannis is the obvious focal point and after a strong Olympic campaign in the “group of death” last summer, he enters EuroBasket ready to dominate. His rim pressure, transition game and defensive range change the equation entirely. Papanikolaou brings toughness and defensive stability on the wing. Toliopoulos was the most consistent presence in the qualifiers, playing all six games, though he often took a backseat when higher-caliber talent was available.

Path: Greece finished 5–1 in a surprisingly competitive group. Wins rarely came easy: their largest margin was just 9 points, and even the games against lighter opponents were tight — they beat the Netherlands by 4 and 2, and lost to Great Britain by one. It was enough to qualify comfortably, but not without flashing a few warning signs.

Strengths: Defense is the identity here. Greece finished top-4 defensively in the qualifying stage, and Giannis only elevates that ceiling. The coaching staff does an excellent job masking weaknesses and playing to the strengths of each lineup. Off-ball movement and role clarity are key pillars — though those may shift a bit with Giannis absorbing more on-ball usage.

Weaknesses: The half-court offense remains a concern. Without Giannis, creation dries up quickly, and shooting limitations across the roster can shrink the floor even when he’s in. Spacing remains an issue, and teams that load up the paint can neutralize much of their drive-and-kick action. They’ll need someone to find rhythm as a secondary engine.

Bottom Line: Giannis gives Greece a real chance, and their defense will keep them alive in any matchup. But without better shooting and more reliable creation, the same old story could play out. If role players step up, they’re dangerous. If not, they’ll lean heavily on one of the best player in the tournament to carry the load — again.

Expectation: Dangerous, But Still Dependent

This is a top-heavy team. Giannis can win you a knockout game, but they need more than that to win the whole thing.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Cyprus: Host Role, Harsh Reality

Group C – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Hosting EuroBasket 2025 should be a moment of celebration for Cyprus, but on the court, it’s shaping up to be a steep uphill climb. The home crowd will bring energy, but the talent gap is stark — Cyprus went 0–6 in the qualifiers and none of the losses were particularly close.

Best Players: Konstantinos Simitzis showed flashes during qualifiers, while Darral Willis was one of their better performers but won’t suit up for the tournament. Filippos Tigkas is the name to watch — a crafty young guard who could emerge as a breakout player despite the team’s struggles.

Path: 0–6. Cyprus never managed to find footing or momentum and couldn’t compete for wins across the board. As tournament hosts, they qualify automatically — but on paper, they remain a tier below the rest of Group C.

Strengths: Tigkas brings legitimate talent and flair to the backcourt. He’ll be given the keys and a green light, which could lead to some highlight moments even in tough losses.

Weaknesses: The talent gap is real. Cyprus struggles to shoot from deep, turns the ball over too often, and lacks the depth or size to compete for four quarters. They’ll battle — but realistically, they’ll be outgunned in every matchup.

Bottom Line: Cyprus is here thanks to the host berth, and they’ll embrace the stage — but every game will be a survival test. Still, the experience could be invaluable for their younger core.

Expectation: #24 – The Host Underdog

Competitive spirit isn’t the issue. Talent is.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Germany: Reloading in Group B with NBA Talent and Experience

Germany’s 4–2 qualifying run was solid but hardly the full story. They swept Montenegro, split games with Bulgaria and Sweden — including a dominant 19-point win over Sweden at home — showing they can adjust and respond under pressure.

Best Players: David Krämer was Germany’s steadiest presence during the qualifiers, delivering efficient scoring across all six games. But the real firepower arrives with the NBA reinforcements: Dennis Schröder, Franz Wagner, and Tristan da Silva headline a dynamic core. Isaiah Hartenstein will miss the tournament due to rehab, but if the rest stay healthy, this is one of the most talent-rich groups in the field.

Strengths: Schröder and Wagner provide clear leadership in the backcourt and wing, while Krämer and Andreas Obst offer elite off-ball shooting and movement. The big men are versatile, able to make plays in the post or stretch the floor. Germany’s defined roles and experience from recent international play give them a strong foundation.

Weaknesses: Schröder’s aggressive style can lead to turnovers and forced offense, sometimes settling for tough isolation plays or contested threes. Wagner’s outside shooting remains a question after shooting 20% from deep at the last Olympics. If that doesn’t improve, opponents can clog driving lanes.

Bottom Line: Germany arrives in Group B with championship aspirations. If their stars stay healthy and Schröder cleans up his decision-making, they’ll be a major threat. Their blend of experience, NBA talent and clear roles makes them one of the favorites.

Expectation: Legit Title Contenders

One of Europe’s elite teams looking to make a serious run at EuroBasket 2025.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.

With EuroBasket 2025 tipping off, this is your one-stop destination for in-depth previews of all 24 national teams heading into Europe’s premier basketball tournament. Whether you’re tracking MVP candidates, X’s-and-O’s brilliance, or just figuring out who might crash the medal party, our Power Rankings and team-by-team breakdowns will keep you ahead of the curve.

Great Britain: A Team of Grit, Size and Searching for Identity

Group B – EuroBasket 2025 Preview

Great Britain heads into EuroBasket 2025 with a roster that has shown flashes of promise but still lacks a clear, consistent identity. Their 4–2 qualifying record included some eye-catching wins but also moments of defensive confusion. The question is whether they can build enough cohesion to challenge the continent’s heavyweights.

Great Britain: Depth and Size Without a Dominant Big

Best Players: Great Britain doesn’t have a single go-to star, but several players took turns leading the way during qualifiers. Gabe Olaseni anchored the interior while Quinn Ellis emerged as a dynamic backcourt threat. OG Anunoby remains eligible but is still a question mark for FIBA play and Brooklyn Nets forward Tosan Evboumwan could give them a much-needed physical boost inside if available.

Strengths: Great Britain’s roster boasts size and length at nearly every position, which allows them to compete physically. They’re disciplined in shot selection, consistently hunting the best look. Their three-point shooting is solid, even if it comes on low volume, adding an important dimension to their offense.

Weaknesses: When Ellis isn’t on the floor, the team struggles for clarity and rhythm. They lack a dominant interior presence, a vulnerability that could be exposed against physical teams like Lithuania, Germany, or Montenegro. Despite their energy, defensive rotations are often sloppy, leading to costly mistakes.

Bottom Line: Great Britain is a scrappy, sizable group that can hang with most teams for stretches. But unless they tighten up defensively and develop a clearer identity on offense, deep runs will remain elusive in a loaded Group B.

Expectation: Middle Tier team

Size and effort are there, but consistency and direction are still a work in progress.

This article was co-written by the hosts of the European Hoops podcast, Tiago Cordeiro and André Lemos. Subscribe to the podcast and follow European Hoops on Twitter: @EthosEuroleague.