So the way I addressed the ability to catch up was by lagging a handful of games back at every position early. By midseason I had an idea of where I'd...

I suppose that part is true. I generally don't take risks early, so around round 7/8 I've got a lot of firm foundational guys and can go BUCK WILD

I like a 2-round penalty on keeping guys. Makes the decision a little tougher!

Correct - waiting is best. Plus we're getting to see everyone else's numbers first and the ADP on guys will change when the B-150 comes out.

Having back-2-back picks is actually a pretty huge negative. It puts copious pressure on you to have to make 2 picks in a row. You also end up having ...

Nah, I'm with Bru. Take the two best dudes left on the board. Myles Turner isn't a bad pair guy with almost any PG or SG, though, in terms of ease of ...

I just find guys like Jon Leuer so nauseating. They're top-100 reliably but they're just not helping. They're taking up valuable space for me to go FU...

I definitely don't, at least not on purpose. If I end up with two solid players on one team, so be it, but I'm not hunting for it. And generally I don...

"50 on the line" -- I agree with your notes to a certain degree. I was posing a hypothetical, so clearly nothing is a 100% situation. Still, a top-10...

Solid question: I'm of the philosophy that 'lagging back' a tiny bit is a good move. Maybe don't play your 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th best players ri...

Wish he'd play a few more mins/game, though

Haha, why Tama, why???

Precisely. And Zain and I always talk on Wednesdays about the power of the rotating roster slot. Pick up a guy who's chugging at a top-50 clip for 2 w...