Notifications
Clear all

Who to offer for Kawhi

8 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
271 Views
(@robinofthehood)
Posts: 12
Member Customer
Topic starter
 

Kawhi is available in my league from a frustrated owner. 9 cat roto.

I'm thinking of making an offer but not sure what Kawhi's value will be like this year. Will he be a first rounder?

I've got Towns, who I'm not trading. I could trade Jimmy Butler, but he's far outperforming Kawhi right now.

I've got Embiid and Holmes to offer, or also perhaps a package of Kris Middleton and Donovan Mitchell.

Would you offer Jimmy, or Embiid and Holmes, or Middleton and Mitchell for Kawhi?

 
Posted : 07/01/2018 7:40 am
(@dbesbris)
Posts: 9458
Member Customer
 

I think I'd lean more toward the top-30 package before offering up someone already rumbling along at 1st round value.

 
Posted : 07/01/2018 8:07 am
 B
(@bklchamp)
Posts: 178
Member Customer
 

I'm thinking of offering HBarnes, but I'm wondering if Kawhi isn't just damanged goods at this point.

 
Posted : 07/01/2018 11:11 am
(@thyrdwyrld)
Posts: 957
Member Customer
 

I'd do Barnes in a minute, but not Butler.

Middleton OR Mitchell and another player, but not both. Maybe Embiid (both will sit games late) , but I'd try lesser players first.

 
Posted : 07/01/2018 12:39 pm
(@mike_damz)
Posts: 78
Member Customer
 

no way i would trade butler

 
Posted : 08/01/2018 12:53 am
(@ameenkreidieh)
Posts: 160
Estimable Member
 

a guy in my league is asking me to send him Garry Harris and Whiteside for his Kawhi!

i think its a bit too much!

now after seeing this post im sure its too much...

do you guys think garry harris + TJ warren is a nice offer?

 
Posted : 08/01/2018 3:19 am
(@dbesbris)
Posts: 9458
Member Customer
 

I don't think this is a buy low any more.

I think it's best to leave Kawhi alone...

 
Posted : 08/01/2018 7:32 am
 AG
(@ag)
Posts: 96
Member Customer
 

For me, if you want Kawhi, I'd only send something small. Like between Mitchell and Holmes. Wouldn't do Middleton at all.

 
Posted : 08/01/2018 8:31 am
Share: