Notifications
Clear all

Clint & Isaac 4 Covington & prince

9 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
299 Views
(@bpencarnado)
Posts: 175
Member Customer
Topic starter
 

12 team 9cat

I have been offered Clint capela and Jonathan Isaac for my Robert Covington and Taurean Prince.

My team

Lilard
Drummond
Bryant
Robinson
Covington
Prince
Levert
Hart
Schroeder
Satoransky
Rubio
Winslow
Bazemore

His team

Capela
Isaac
Simmons
Curry
Graham
Bacon
Turner
Huerter
Hood
Adams
Herro
Adebayo
Hachimura

I think I should counter. I want to cheat him out of a deal, and I know he would fall for something stupid.... Do you guys have any ideas? He lost pretty bad last week so I feel like he's really desperate and losing his mind and I want to take advantage of it... 😁 But as I look at his team it looks like it deserves to be flushed down the toilet...

 
Posted : 28/10/2019 6:11 am
(@brennomachadom)
Posts: 161
Member Customer
 

I would do this trade

If you do think he is not that smart, you could offer Drummond/Winslow/Schroder for Curry and see if it happens

 
Posted : 28/10/2019 6:32 am
(@stefanchris)
Posts: 180
Member Customer
 

I'd slam that accept button!

 
Posted : 28/10/2019 7:36 am
(@joe-sarvadi)
Posts: 916
Member Customer
 

I would make that trade! Capela is the best of the 4 for sure and can make a huge difference in your lineup.

 
Posted : 28/10/2019 8:06 am
davidjk2000
(@davidjk2000)
Posts: 400
Member Customer
 

Agreed. Take the deal and run.

 
Posted : 28/10/2019 8:14 am
(@joe-sarvadi)
Posts: 916
Member Customer
 

BOOM!

 
Posted : 28/10/2019 8:45 am
(@bpencarnado)
Posts: 175
Member Customer
Topic starter
 

If I added Powell, and drop baze or Hart, or satoransky, is having 5 PF/C too much?

 
Posted : 28/10/2019 1:05 pm
davidjk2000
(@davidjk2000)
Posts: 400
Member Customer
 

I don't think it'd hurt at all. I would hold Bazemore though.

 
Posted : 28/10/2019 4:56 pm
davidjk2000
(@davidjk2000)
Posts: 400
Member Customer
 

I don't think it'd hurt at all. I would hold Bazemore though.

 
Posted : 28/10/2019 4:58 pm
Share: